Considering tactical frameworks
I need to be mindful of the knowledge cutoff, which is October 2024, and it’s currently December 2025. I'll ensure any analysis remains general and won't reference events post-2024.
So, I'll clarify the tactical frameworks Southgate uses, like 4-2-3-1 and 3-4-3/5-2-3 formations, and detail the candidates for the attacking positions. I'll talk about their strengths and weaknesses, focusing on how they fit into those formations and their connections with Kane. Let's craft a comprehensive answer!Evaluating candidates for No. 10
I see that chemistry is a key factor, especially with players’ previous roles.
I should look closely at the candidates: Maddison offers chance creation but has some concerns with pressing and injuries, whereas Grealish draws fouls but may not fit perfectly as a No. 10. Cole Palmer has emerged as a contender for the role.
The user's title hints at five players, so I’m considering Bellingham, Foden, Maddison, Mount, and Palmer. However, I wonder if a quick clarifying question is needed for more context.Proposing a starting order
I can create a compact analysis and suggest a starting order for England's lineup.
If they're up against a top team, I’d start Bellingham as the No. 10 in a 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1, with Rice and another 6 or 8. Foden could either start wide or be benched. If dealing with a low block, I might switch Foden to the No. 10 spot and place Bellingham as RCM.
The pecking order could be Bellingham first, followed by Foden, Maddison, Palmer, and Mount. Notably, if Grealish is mentioned, I'd clarify his position as a left winger, not a 10.
\n
\n
谁首发,谁落选?给你一版可用的英格兰10号位人选排序与用法,顺带解释“罗杰斯搅局”的含义。
结论(先说人话)
为什么是这套
五人快评
“罗杰斯搅局”指什么
临场预案
\n
如果你想按具体大名单或对手(比如法/西/阿)细化,我可以给出对应首发与换人时间点版本。
下一篇:不管扮演什么角色,我们都是女神
版权所有:重庆欧博官网工程有限公司